Scoring details · 2022 NCAA Championships
2022 team scoring details
How each team’s points add up: advancement, bonus and placement points, calculated from every bout under the 2016 scoring rules. The official standings are on the 2022 tournament page.
Calculated points against the published standings
Points are calculated from the 2022 bouts under the 2016 rules: advancement (including byes), bonus, guaranteed-place increments, and any documented adjustments. 59 of 66 programs match the published total exactly; 7 differ; 6 are not listed in the published standings.
| Calculated rank | Program | Calculated points | Advancement | Bonus | Placement | Adjustments | Published place | Published points | Difference from published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Penn State | 131.5 | 26 | 16.5 | 89 | 0 | 1 | 131.5 | 0 |
| 2 | Michigan | 95 | 25.5 | 11.5 | 58 | 0 | 2 | 95 | 0 |
| 3 | Iowa | 74 | 22.5 | 9.5 | 42 | 0 | 3 | 74 | 0 |
| 4 | Arizona State | 67 | 18.5 | 12.5 | 36 | 0 | 4 | 66.5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | Nebraska | 59.5 | 19.5 | 8 | 32 | 0 | 5 | 59.5 | 0 |
| 6 | Northwestern (IL) | 57.5 | 15.5 | 7 | 35 | 0 | 6 | 57.5 | 0 |
| 7 | Cornell (NY) | 54.5 | 17.5 | 8 | 29 | 0 | 7 | 54.5 | 0 |
| 8 | Virginia Tech | 52.5 | 15.5 | 9 | 28 | 0 | 8 | 52.5 | 0 |
| 9 | Missouri | 50.5 | 14.5 | 11 | 25 | 0 | 9 | 49.5 | +1 |
| 10 | North Carolina State | 49 | 16.5 | 11.5 | 21 | 0 | 10 | 49 | 0 |
| 11 | Minnesota | 48.5 | 10.5 | 11 | 27 | 0 | 11 | 48.5 | 0 |
| 12 | Oregon State | 45.5 | 17.5 | 9 | 19 | 0 | 12 | 44.5 | +1 |
| 13 | Ohio State | 44 | 16 | 5 | 23 | 0 | 13 | 44 | 0 |
| 14 | Oklahoma State | 38.5 | 12.5 | 8 | 18 | 0 | T14 | 38.5 | 0 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 38.5 | 10.5 | 9 | 19 | 0 | T14 | 38.5 | 0 |
| 16 | Princeton (NJ) | 38 | 10 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 16 | 38 | 0 |
| 16 | Iowa State | 38 | 9.5 | 7.5 | 21 | 0 | 17 | 37 | +1 |
| 18 | Stanford (CA) | 32.5 | 9.5 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 19 | 31.5 | +1 |
| 19 | North Carolina | 32 | 11 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 32 | 0 |
| 20 | Northern Iowa | 28.5 | 11.5 | 7 | 10 | 0 | T20 | 28.5 | 0 |
| 20 | Rutgers (NJ) | 28.5 | 10 | 5.5 | 13 | 0 | T20 | 28.5 | 0 |
| 22 | California-Poly | 28 | 8 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 22 | 28 | 0 |
| 23 | Wyoming | 21 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 23 | 21 | 0 |
| 24 | Pittsburgh (PA) | 20.5 | 9.5 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 24 | 20.5 | 0 |
| 25 | Illinois | 17.5 | 5.5 | 5 | 7 | 0 | T25 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 25 | Lehigh (PA) | 17.5 | 5.5 | 2 | 10 | 0 | T25 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 27 | Pennsylvania | 15.5 | 8.5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 27 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 28 | Appalachian State (NC) | 13.5 | 5.5 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 28 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 29 | Oklahoma | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 11 | +1 |
| 30 | Purdue (IN) | 10.5 | 7.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | T30 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 30 | Virginia | 10.5 | 7.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | T30 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 32 | West Virginia | 9.5 | 4.5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 32 | 8.5 | +1 |
| 33 | Drexel (PA) | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 8 | 0 |
| 34 | North Dakota State | 7.5 | 4.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 35 | Rider (NJ) | 6 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 6 | 0 |
| 36 | Air Force (CO) | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | T36 | 5 | 0 |
| 36 | Binghamton (NY) | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T36 | 5 | 0 |
| 36 | Campbell (NC) | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | T36 | 5 | 0 |
| 39 | Central Michigan | 4.5 | 3.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T39 | 4.5 | 0 |
| 39 | Northern Illinois | 4.5 | 3.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T39 | 4.5 | 0 |
| 41 | Army (NY) | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | T41 | 4 | 0 |
| 41 | Citadel (SC) | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | T41 | 4 | 0 |
| 41 | Michigan State | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | T41 | 4 | 0 |
| 44 | Northern Colorado | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T44 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 44 | South Dakota State | 3.5 | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T44 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 46 | Bloomsburg (PA) | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | T46 | 3 | 0 |
| 46 | Clarion (PA) | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | T46 | 3 | 0 |
| 48 | Bucknell (PA) | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T48 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 48 | Duke (NC) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T48 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 48 | Maryland | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T48 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 48 | Navy (MD) | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | T48 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 52 | Harvard (MA) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T52 | 2 | 0 |
| 52 | Utah Valley | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T52 | 2 | 0 |
| 54 | Columbia (NY) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T54 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 54 | Lock Haven (PA) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T54 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 56 | California-Bakersfield | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T56 | 1 | 0 |
| 56 | Cleveland State (OH) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T56 | 1 | 0 |
| 56 | Indiana (IN) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T56 | 1 | 0 |
| 56 | Kent State (OH) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T56 | 1 | 0 |
| 56 | Tennessee-Chattanooga | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | T56 | 1 | 0 |
| 61 | Buffalo (NY) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
| 61 | Edinboro (PA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
| 61 | Franklin & Marshall (PA) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
| 61 | Gardner-Webb (NC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
| 61 | Hofstra (NY) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
| 61 | Ohio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | not listed | not listed | not listed |
Difference from published is the calculated total minus the published total. Calculated rank is the program’s position among calculated totals, which can differ from its published place.
Published standings: NCAA Division I Wrestling Championships Records Book, All-Time Team Results, 2022.